CEO / Board
What changed, why does it matter and which workforce decision now needs leadership attention?
Evalio dashboards
See the decision, not just the data.
A useful dashboard should answer what changed, why it matters and what someone needs to decide next. Evalio views are designed around those questions rather than around the amount of data available.
The Evalio aha
Different leaders can see the same workforce choice through the consequence they own — without creating different versions of the truth.
The question changes by seat
One connected decision. Different executive questions.
The dashboard should bring the relevant implication forward without hiding the evidence and connected modules behind it.
CFO
What is moving workforce cost, which assumptions are driving it and what alternative should we compare?
CHRO
Where are job, reward, equity or workforce decisions becoming inconsistent or difficult to defend?
Total Rewards
Which roles, pay positions, structures or exceptions need professional review before action?
Workforce Planning
Where is the plan moving away from the baseline and what does that do to capability and cost?
Governance
Which decisions are open, challenged, approved or missing the evidence required to proceed?
See representative views
Inspect the decision readout before you need a live workspace.
Representative views use non-client data to show the shape of the experience. Live organisational data and authorised decisions remain inside the protected workspace.
Executive Dashboard
CEO · Executive committee
Is the workforce decision estate board-ready this cycle?
Board readiness
One pack pending
Decision velocity
3 in review
Critical talent risk
Contained
Governance state
1 gap open
- What changed
- Three workforce decisions moved into human review; one board pack is pending approval.
- Why
- Structure refresh, a regional pay alignment, and the merit envelope all reached recommendation stage together.
- Risk
- One decision carries an unresolved evidence gap that should not enter the board pack unresolved.
- Cost
- Combined envelope exposure sits inside the approved budget band, with one scenario above tolerance.
- Decision required
- Approve the board pack, or return the flagged decision for evidence completion.
- Next action
- Executive sponsor reviews the flagged decision in the Decision Room before sealing the pack.
CHRO Dashboard
CHRO · People leadership
Are pay, structure, and equity decisions defensible before they are made?
Architecture coverage
Refresh landed
Equity review
2 families open
Promotion risk
Watch
Human review queue
Moving
- What changed
- Equity review reopened for two role families after the job architecture refresh.
- Why
- New leveling moved several roles across grade boundaries, changing internal comparators.
- Risk
- Unresolved equity signals could surface in promotion and merit rounds if not closed first.
- Cost
- Remediation is bounded; the exposure is reputational and consistency-driven, not budget-breaking.
- Decision required
- Confirm the remediation scope, or accept documented exceptions with rationale.
- Next action
- HRBP and rewards prepare the equity review record for named-approver sign-off.
CFO Dashboard
CFO · Finance leadership
Does the reward and workforce plan stay inside the budget envelope?
Budget utilization
Above band
Cost scenarios
2 alternatives
Range pressure
Elevated
EOS exposure
Modelled
- What changed
- A workforce scenario now runs above the approved cost envelope for two quarters.
- Why
- Headcount phasing plus range pressure in two structures pushed the blended cost curve up.
- Risk
- If approved unchanged, the plan breaches the envelope before mid-year re-forecast.
- Cost
- The overage is quantified against budget; two lower-cost alternatives are framed for review.
- Decision required
- Choose the phasing alternative, or approve the envelope adjustment with rationale.
- Next action
- Finance reviews the scenario pack and records the trade-off decision in the Decision Room.
Compensation Dashboard
Compensation lead
Are salary structures and pay positions defensible against market and policy?
Structure health
2 under pressure
Market confidence
Refreshed
Pay position spread
Widening
Offer competitiveness
Watch
- What changed
- Two structures moved into range-pressure territory after the latest market refresh.
- Why
- Market movement outpaced the current midpoints for select job families.
- Risk
- Sustained compression raises attrition and offer-competitiveness risk in those families.
- Cost
- A structure adjustment is scoped with a costed range shift and phased eligibility.
- Decision required
- Approve the range adjustment, or hold with a documented monitoring plan.
- Next action
- Rewards prepares the salary structure pack with market posture for approver review.
Total Rewards Dashboard
Total Rewards leadership
Do pay, benefits, equity, and incentives move as one governed system?
Merit exceptions
Above plan
Incentive review
In progress
Benefits posture
Steady
Equity linkage
Connected
- What changed
- The merit cycle opened with a higher-than-planned exception volume in one region.
- Why
- Manager submissions clustered above guidelines where performance and pay position conflicted.
- Risk
- Uncontrolled exceptions erode the structure and the fairness narrative if approved unchecked.
- Cost
- Exception cost is aggregated against the merit envelope with an in-band recommendation.
- Decision required
- Approve the exception policy for this cycle, or return specific cases for rework.
- Next action
- Total Rewards records the merit governance pack and routes exceptions to named approvers.
Workforce Planning Dashboard
Workforce planning · Strategy
Can the plan meet capability demand inside cost and risk tolerance?
Headcount scenarios
3 costed
Capability pressure
Rising
Retention risk
2 areas
Scenario confidence
Stated
- What changed
- Retention risk rose in two critical capability areas across the planning horizon.
- Why
- Demand for scarce skills outpaced the build-buy-borrow plan in those areas.
- Risk
- Capability gaps threaten delivery commitments if the plan is not rebalanced.
- Cost
- Three headcount scenarios are costed with their capability and timing trade-offs.
- Decision required
- Select the scenario, or approve a mitigation with documented assumptions.
- Next action
- Planning prepares the workforce planning pack for executive trade-off review.
Governance Dashboard
Governance · Audit · Compliance
Is every material decision reviewable, approved, and audit-ready?
Open review questions
1 flagged
Approval integrity
Enforced
Audit trail
Complete
Override events
Logged
- What changed
- One decision advanced to approval without its evidence gap fully closed.
- Why
- A reviewer question stayed open while the recommendation moved forward.
- Risk
- An open question inside an approved record weakens defensibility on later challenge.
- Cost
- No direct cost; the exposure is audit and governance integrity.
- Decision required
- Return the record for closure, or record an explicit accepted-risk rationale.
- Next action
- Governance owner routes the record back through review and logs the resolution.
Consulting Delivery Dashboard
Consulting partner · Advisory
Is client delivery evidence-led, methodology-safe, and governed?
Engagement stage
Scenario review
Methodology boundary
Protected
Source-rights posture
1 note open
Client-safe mode
On
- What changed
- A client engagement moved from evidence assembly into scenario review.
- Why
- Role evidence and market posture reached the completeness bar for scenario framing.
- Risk
- Presenting a scenario as an outcome would breach the advisory boundary if uncontrolled.
- Cost
- Scope stays inside the engagement envelope; one scenario needs a source-rights note.
- Decision required
- Confirm the client-safe scenario set, or request additional evidence first.
- Next action
- Partner reviews the client-safe pack; the client owns the final decision.
What makes the view useful
Every dashboard should lead somewhere.
The value is not another executive summary. The buyer should be able to move from the signal to the role, evidence, scenario, module or decision that explains it.
Signal
What changed or deserves attention?
Reason
Which evidence, assumption or connected consequence explains it?
Next decision
Who needs to review, compare or act — and what should they see first?
See the story behind the dashboard
Follow the signal back to the decision that created it.
Explore representative proof, the connected modules or the Decision Room when you want to see more than the executive surface.