Skip to main content
Talk to EvalioRequest Access
Decision Room

The executive control room for governed workforce and total rewards decisions.

Evalio Decision Room brings evidence, assumptions, risks, scenarios, reviewers, approvals, and records into one governed workflow — so leaders can decide with traceability instead of scattered decks and side-channel approvals.

Governed PreviewRepresentative Preview · Not Client DataWorkspace runtime requires verified access
This public surface explains the Decision Room operating model. Live tenant decisions remain inside the protected workspace under /w/[workspace]/decisions, with authentication, entitlement, and tenant isolation. Public previews never show client data, proprietary mechanics, or final approval claims.
View representative proofRequest proof access
Workflow

How a governed decision is structured.

  1. Step 1

    Frame the workforce or rewards decision

  2. Step 2

    Attach evidence and source-rights notes

  3. Step 3

    Record assumptions, risks, and alternatives

  4. Step 4

    Assign reviewers and approval posture

  5. Step 5

    Seal the decision record for audit/export

Governance model

What executives should expect to see before deciding.

Evidence, not theatre

Inputs, source posture, reviewer notes, and proof artifacts are gathered before a decision is treated as review-ready.

Human authority remains explicit

Companion Intelligence can explain gaps or draft review questions, but it cannot finalize the decision path.

Audit-ready by design

Each decision is organized around a record: evidence, assumptions, risks, alternatives, approvers, lifecycle status, and export posture.

Companion × Decision Room

One governed flow: evidence becomes a defensible decision record.

Companion Intelligence and the Decision Room operate as one experience. At every stage the Companion prepares advisory material and a named human stays accountable. The hard human gates cannot be satisfied by AI.

AI prepares. Consultant reviews. Client decides.

  1. 01Evidence

    Role evidence, decision context, and source-rights posture enter under a structured intake. Gaps and contradictions are surfaced, not hidden.

    Companion prepares: Structures the evidence, flags missing inputs, and surfaces contradictions for review.
    Accountable: Consultant / data steward
  2. 02Analysis

    The structured evidence is interpreted against the governed methodology to produce a confidence-aware view.

    Companion prepares: Summarizes what the evidence supports, in plain language, with confidence stated qualitatively — never raw scores or mechanics.
    Accountable: Consultant
  3. 03Risk

    Risks, thin evidence, and review-attention items are made explicit before any decision is treated as ready.

    Companion prepares: Identifies risks and the questions a reviewer would normally ask before the decision is safe.
    Accountable: Consultant
  4. 04Alternatives

    Controlled alternatives are framed with their assumptions and caveats. None is presented as an approved outcome.

    Companion prepares: Frames bounded what-if alternatives with explicit assumptions — labelled as options for review, not decisions.
    Accountable: Consultant
  5. 05Human review
    Human gate

    A named consultant reviews the prepared evidence, risks, and alternatives and applies professional judgment.

    Companion prepares: Nothing — this is a human-only act.
    Accountable: Consultant (named reviewer)
  6. 06Challenge

    The reviewed position is stress-tested — contradictions, edge cases, and objections are raised and resolved.

    Companion prepares: Surfaces contradictions and counter-considerations to support the challenge — it does not adjudicate them.
    Accountable: Consultant / reviewer
  7. 07Approval
    Human gate

    The client decides. A named human approver accepts accountability for the outcome.

    Companion prepares: Nothing — this is a human-only act.
    Accountable: Client approver (named)
  8. 08Decision record
    Human gate

    The decision is captured with its evidence, rationale, reviewers, and approver — the governed record of what was decided and why.

    Companion prepares: Drafts the rationale narrative for review; the human approver confirms and owns the recorded decision.
    Accountable: Client approver
  9. 09Artifact

    A governed, truth-labelled artifact is produced — defensible for board review, audit, and institutional memory.

    Companion prepares: Drafts governance-safe report sections for review; export and publication remain human- and entitlement-gated.
    Accountable: Consultant / client
  10. 10Audit trail

    Every invocation, review, override, and approval is logged. The append-only trail is the institutional record.

    Companion prepares: Nothing — this is a human-only act.
    Accountable: System of record (human-owned governance)
Human accountability

Every artifact carries a visible accountability state.

There is no AI-only decision state. The Companion can produce one thing — an AI-prepared observation. Every state above it names a human owner, through to a locked, audit-ready record.

  1. 01AI-prepared observation

    Evidence structured, risks surfaced, alternatives framed. No decision is implied. Cannot be used downstream until a human reviews it.

    Companion may produce · Companion (advisory only)

  2. 02Consultant-reviewed note

    A named consultant has reviewed the prepared material and applied professional judgment. Still not a decision.

    Human-owned · Consultant (named)

  3. 03Client decision

    The client has made the call. The decision is attributed to a named human owner who is accountable for it.

    Human-owned · Client (named)

  4. 04Pending approval

    The decision is awaiting a recorded approval action from the named approver. It is not yet effective.

    Human-owned · Approver queue

  5. 05Approved decision

    A named human approver has accepted accountability. The decision is effective and attributable.

    Human-owned · Named approver

  6. 06Locked record

    The decision record is sealed for audit and export. It is append-only — changes create new governed events, never silent edits.

    Human-owned · System of record

Boundary

What the Companion can and cannot do in the room.

What the Companion can do

  • Summarize evidence in plain language.
  • Surface assumptions and make them explicit.
  • Identify risks and review-attention items.
  • Frame controlled alternatives with their caveats.
  • Highlight contradictions in the evidence.
  • Suggest where a reviewer should focus attention.
  • Explain credible Total Rewards concepts.
  • Draft a rationale narrative for human review.

What the Companion cannot do

  • Approve or finalize a decision.
  • Assign a grade autonomously.
  • Set pay, commission, or entitlement.
  • Replace consultant review.
  • Make a legal conclusion or compliance certification.
  • Fabricate market, survey, benefits, or client data.
  • Expose scoring weights, thresholds, formulas, or protected methodology.
  • Override governance or bypass Decision Room review.

Evalio's scoring weights, thresholds, formulas, mapping mechanics, and derivation logic are protected. No Companion surface — public or in-product — exposes them, and the Companion will refuse any request to do so.

Connection

Where Decision Room connects across Evalio.

Modules feed the record

Input → analysis → review → Decision Room → report/export → audit record.

Companion supports review

Guide, Evidence, Scenario, Decision, Mentor, and Growth modes remain advisory and evidence-grounded.

Trust controls frame use

Security, governance, source-rights, and audit controls determine what can be claimed as live.