One-role proof pack
A representative governed case file showing how one unclear role becomes a review-ready proof artifact.
Explore one-role proof packGoverned proof
See representative outputs before operational rollout.
Evalio uses guided proof experiences, representative previews, and bounded demonstrations to help buyers understand the operating model before workspace activation.
Sample proof pack
The full representative Proof Pack structure: evidence, review state, risk, AI advisory notes, and governed next actions.
Explore sample proof packDecision Room preview
A public-safe review-grade slice of the representative Decision Room, focused on evidence, risk, review, and auditability.
Explore decision room previewProof previews
Representative examples of governed outputs, reports, and workforce decision surfaces.
Explore proof previewsGuided demos
Structured demonstrations of Evalio workflows, decision flows, and bounded product experiences.
Explore guided demosRelease-0 proof
The bounded proof corridor for controlled evaluation and guided workspace exploration.
Explore release-0 proofProof journey guidance
Mode Guide / Surface proof_preview
Governance narrative
Every consequential workforce decision travels one governed path.
This is the operating model that connects the Decision Room, Companion Intelligence, Trust, and Proof. Each stage has a named human owner. Companion assists; it never approves, grades, or decides.
- 01Evidence
Role evidence, decision context, and source-rights posture enter under a structured intake. Gaps and contradictions are surfaced, not hidden.
Accountable: Operator · Evidence Agent prepares - 02Evaluation
The protected methodology runs structure, grading, and scenario logic against the assembled evidence — a bounded evaluation, never a finalised decision.
Accountable: Protected methodology - 03Review
A consultant reviews the prepared evidence and applies professional judgment before anything advances.
Accountable: Consultant reviewer - 04Challenge
Assumptions are tested, alternatives weighed, risks named, and open questions recorded against the record before approval.
Accountable: Reviewer · challenger - 05Approval
A named human approver accepts the decision basis at a governed approval gate, or sends it back.
Accountable: Named approver - 06Decision
The accountable owner decides. The decision, its rationale, and its evidence basis are bound together as the governed decision of record.
Accountable: Client decision owner - 07Artifact
A bounded, representative artifact is generated — evidence-dependent and traceable, never a final automated decision.
Accountable: System · bounded output - 08Audit Trail
Evidence, reviewer, rationale, approver, and timestamp are recorded append-only and stay re-openable.
Accountable: Append-only record - 09Institutional Memory
The governed decision becomes durable precedent — traceable context the institution can reopen and learn from.
Accountable: Institution
Accountable
A named human owns every consequential decision. Companion Intelligence prepares evidence and frames options under this sequence — it does not approve, grade, set pay, or override governance.
Runtime trust
What is real, governed, protected, and pending — shown, not asserted.
Each row below is grounded in live deployment metadata or in-repo runtime evidence. Nothing here is fabricated; unknown values read UNKNOWN and open blockers are disclosed rather than hidden.
- Deployment identityRuntime-backed
- GitHub main via Vercel → https://www.evaliogroup.comEvidence: Constant deployment contract verified against /public-build.json and /runtime-public-status.
- Build / runtime versionRuntime-backed
- commit bce0f17a · env productionEvidence: Read from env-injected Git/Vercel build metadata; UNKNOWN when a variable is absent — never fabricated.
- Public route healthRuntime-backed
- Public marketing spine served from the canonical host; protected product, workspace & admin routes remain authenticated.Evidence: Route-authority manifest + protectedRoutesAuthenticated flag; probed via the route-validation suite.
- Governance postureDoctrine-backed
- Doctrine → Blueprint → Capability Map → Operating Bible → Screen Bible → Runtime → Evidence → Public Claim. No public claim ships without one of those classifications.Evidence: Locked governing chain; classification surfaced on /trust.
- Audit event postureGoverned
- Every decision state change is recorded as an append-only history entry (actor, action, from/to state, reason). On activation this becomes the workspace audit trail.Evidence: DecisionHistoryEntry append-only model (decisionOS).
- Decision Room FSM postureRuntime-backed
- 9 governed states (draft → evidence → review → challenge → awaiting approval → approved → locked). Approval and lock are human acts; the OS never transitions into them autonomously.Evidence: DECISION_STATES constant (decisionOS/types.ts).
- RLS / tenant-safety postureGoverned · validation pending
- Workspace isolation is enforced by Supabase Row-Level Security. End-to-end RLS isolation evidence is tracked openly as an unresolved launch blocker rather than asserted.Evidence: Single-project Supabase authority; RLS validation tracked in the blocker register.
- AI fail-closed postureRuntime-backed
- Any AI contribution is advisory-only and must declare human_review_required = true at the type level. AI can never carry approval, finalisation, or autonomous action; a deterministic fallback is used when the model is operator-gated.Evidence: AIContract.human_review_required (compile-time `true`, decisionOS/types.ts).
- Protected methodology boundaryProtected
- Scoring weights, thresholds, factor mechanics and framework-conversion logic are never exposed on any public surface. Reviewability is provided without revealing internal scoring.Evidence: Methodology boundary enforced across public components.
- Known unresolved blockers8 open
- 8 of 10 tracked launch blockers remain open and are disclosed rather than hidden. Categories: Supabase conflict, RLS validation missing, Stripe lifecycle, Authenticated runtime journey, Arabic parity gap, Monitoring/Sentry missing, Environment variables missing, Video/proof asset gap.Evidence: BLOCKERS register; posture is SOFT_LAUNCH_ONLY until closed.
- Launch postureSOFT_LAUNCH_ONLY
- Evalio is in controlled soft launch. This surface reports deployment truth and governed posture only; it does not assert full production certification.Evidence: SOFT_LAUNCH_VERDICT (publicBuildStatus.ts).
Rosetta Stone
Proof artifacts follow the connected workforce decision chain.
Every representative artifact is easier to inspect when it is clear which part of the chain it supports: job architecture, evaluation, grade, skills, market, salary structure, equity, merit, cost, budget, plan, or executive decision.
01
Job Architecture
02
Job Evaluation
03
Grade
04
Skills
05
Market Intelligence
06
Salary Structure
07
Internal Equity
08
Merit Increase
09
Workforce Cost
10
Workforce Budget
11
Workforce Plan
12
Executive Decision
Artifact 01
Job Architecture Map
Evidence, assumptions, review state, and output boundary visible.
Artifact 02
Evaluation Grade Card
Evidence, assumptions, review state, and output boundary visible.
Artifact 03
Salary Structure Pack
Evidence, assumptions, review state, and output boundary visible.
Artifact 04
Internal Equity Review
Evidence, assumptions, review state, and output boundary visible.
Artifact 05
Workforce Budget Scenario
Evidence, assumptions, review state, and output boundary visible.
Artifact 06
Executive Decision Pack
Evidence, assumptions, review state, and output boundary visible.
Proof artifacts
The full enterprise proof-artifact set is visible before activation.
Each artifact is representative, review-stateful, public-safe, and connected to Decision Room lineage.
Role evidence record
Review state visibleHuman reviewer: Named reviewer required
Job evaluation grade card
Review state visibleHuman reviewer: Named reviewer required
AI Companion review notes
Review state visibleHuman reviewer: Named reviewer required
Market summary
Review state visibleHuman reviewer: Named reviewer required
Salary structure pack
Review state visibleHuman reviewer: Named reviewer required
Internal equity review
Review state visibleHuman reviewer: Named reviewer required
Merit governance pack
Review state visibleHuman reviewer: Named reviewer required
Workforce planning scenario
Review state visibleHuman reviewer: Named reviewer required
Decision record
Review state visibleHuman reviewer: Named reviewer required
Board governance pack
Review state visibleHuman reviewer: Named reviewer required
Representative preview - Not client data - Not production evidenceConfidence: review-qualified
Board Pack Preview
A leadership-ready pack collects the decision narrative, assumptions, risks, alternatives, review state, and audit references.
Representative preview - Not client data - Not production evidenceConfidence: review-qualified
Export Preview
Exports are labeled by status and can only be production evidence after workspace access, client evidence, review, and approval.
Representative preview - Not client data - Not production evidence
Public previews show product shape, governance state, review posture, and artifact lineage. They do not show client data, production evidence, private survey data, protected methodology, public JS scores, or trace.
Dashboards and reports
Proof artifacts feed representative dashboards and reports.
The public route shows executive product shape: workforce cost, headcount, critical talent risk, pay equity, retention risk, budget utilization, decision velocity, governance state, audit references, and board-ready report structure.
Representative preview - Not client data - Not production evidence
Public previews show product shape, governance state, review posture, and artifact lineage. They do not show client data, production evidence, private survey data, protected methodology, public JS scores, or trace.
Representative preview - Not client data - Not production evidenceConfidence: review-qualified
Executive Dashboard
Board readiness, workforce cost posture, governance status, and critical talent risk in one executive view.
Board readiness
Lineage available in Decision Room
Workforce cost posture
Lineage available in Decision Room
Critical talent risk
Lineage available in Decision Room
Decision velocity
Lineage available in Decision Room
Representative KPI viewLocked only after human approval
Follow metric lineageRepresentative preview - Not client data - Not production evidenceConfidence: review-qualified
CHRO Dashboard
Architecture coverage, evaluation backlog, equity review state, promotion risk, and open approval gates.
Architecture coverage
Lineage available in Decision Room
Equity review state
Lineage available in Decision Room
Promotion risk
Lineage available in Decision Room
Human review queue
Lineage available in Decision Room
Representative KPI viewLocked only after human approval
Follow metric lineageRepresentative preview - Not client data - Not production evidenceConfidence: review-qualified
CFO Dashboard
Budget utilization, workforce cost scenarios, pay structure exposure, and end-of-service cost posture.
Budget utilization
Lineage available in Decision Room
Cost scenarios
Lineage available in Decision Room
Range pressure
Lineage available in Decision Room
EOS exposure
Lineage available in Decision Room
Representative KPI viewLocked only after human approval
Follow metric lineageRepresentative preview - Not client data - Not production evidenceConfidence: review-qualified
Total Rewards Dashboard
Salary structures, merit cycle exceptions, market source posture, and incentive review state.
Structure health
Lineage available in Decision Room
Merit exceptions
Lineage available in Decision Room
Market confidence
Lineage available in Decision Room
Incentive review
Lineage available in Decision Room
Representative KPI viewLocked only after human approval
Follow metric lineageRepresentative preview - Not client data - Not production evidenceConfidence: review-qualified
Workforce Planning Dashboard
Headcount scenarios, capability pressure, retention risk, and executive trade-off readiness.
Headcount scenarios
Lineage available in Decision Room
Capability pressure
Lineage available in Decision Room
Retention risk
Lineage available in Decision Room
Scenario confidence
Lineage available in Decision Room
Representative KPI viewLocked only after human approval
Follow metric lineageBoard Pack
Executive-ready workforce decision summary with assumptions, review states, risks, alternatives, and audit references.
Review state visibleHuman reviewer: Named reviewer required
Decision Record Export
Locked record export showing context, evidence, reviewer rationale, approval state, artifact lineage, and audit trail.
Review state visibleHuman reviewer: Named reviewer required
Evidence Packet Export
Source-aware evidence package with completeness posture, contradictions, and human review notes.
Review state visibleHuman reviewer: Named reviewer required
Audit Package
Governance record with owner, timestamp, reviewer, approval posture, override events, and export watermark.
Review state visibleHuman reviewer: Named reviewer required
Governance Review Summary
Cross-module review summary for open approvals, risks, exceptions, and follow-up actions.
Review state visibleHuman reviewer: Named reviewer required
Workforce Planning Scenario Report
Scenario pack with assumptions, cost posture, alternatives, risks, and executive review state.
Review state visibleHuman reviewer: Named reviewer required
Total Rewards Summary
Integrated compensation, benefits, equity, incentive, and cycle governance summary.
Review state visibleHuman reviewer: Named reviewer required
Compensation Structure Summary
Salary structure review with level linkage, range posture, market caveats, equity signals, and approval state.
Review state visibleHuman reviewer: Named reviewer required
Representative outputs
The governed outputs Evalio produces.
Each is shown as a runtime-backed preview or a clearly labeled representative preview — never client records, survey data, or final decisions.
Decision Records
Job Architecture Artifacts
Salary Structure Packs
Internal Equity Reviews
Merit Governance Packs
Workforce Planning Scenarios
Governance Packs
Evidence chain
How a representative output is produced.
Every output traces back to the evidence that produced it. The protected methodology runs between intake and artifact; its mechanics stay confidential.
01
Evidence
Role evidence and decision context enter under a structured intake with source-rights posture.
02
Evaluation
The protected methodology runs structure, grading, and scenario logic against the evidence.
03
Artifact
A bounded, representative output is produced — traceable to its inputs, never a final decision.
Approval chain
How a representative output is approved.
No output reaches a workforce decision without review, challenge, and a named human approver. The approval is recorded.
Review
A consultant reviews the prepared evidence and applies judgment before anything advances.
Challenge
Assumptions are tested, alternatives weighed, and risks named against the record.
Approval
A named human approver accepts the basis at a governed gate — or sends it back.
Audit Trail
Evidence, reviewer, rationale, and approver are recorded append-only and stay re-openable.
Representative Preview — Illustration purposes only
These previews show the structure of Evalio outputs before your own data is used. They are representative artifacts — not client records, salary survey data, or final decisions. No scoring weights, thresholds, or proprietary derivation logic is included.
The arc below follows one governed evidence chain: a role becomes evidence, the Companion prepares it for review, Job Evaluation produces a grade view, and the same evidence extends into market, equity, board governance, and an auditable Decision Room record. Job Evaluation is the entry point, not the whole platform. See all ten representative artifacts in the full artifact gallery.
Role evidence record · representative preview
Senior Finance Manager — role evidence record
The entry point to every Evalio decision. Raw role input is structured into reviewable evidence vectors before any grade, level, or pay view is produced. No scoring is applied at this stage.
Representative PreviewRepresentative preview · not client dataMissing evidenceIllustrative / Preview · AI prepares · consultant reviews · client decides
- Purpose
- Structure raw role input into reviewable evidence before any grade, level, or pay view.
- Date
- 2026-05-21
- Version
- v1
- Status
- Draft
- Approval
- Draft
- Reviewer(s)
- Named consultant reviewer
- Decision lineage
- Decision Room record · opens after evidence
Workflow stageEvidence intake — the entry point of the WDI loopDecision RoomNot yet linked — opens once evidence is confirmed
- Source input (as provided)
- “Runs FP&A for the region, manages the budget process, deals with the auditors, and looks after a few analysts.” Captured from an existing job description and a hiring-manager intake note.
- Structured evidence vectors
- Scope — financial planning across a multi-country region; ambiguity on number of legal entities covered.
- Accountabilities — owns the annual budget cycle and forecast accuracy; supports statutory audit.
- Decision rights — described only as “deals with auditors”; spend-approval authority not stated.
- People leadership — “a few analysts”; exact span and whether any are managers is unconfirmed.
- Evidence completeness
- Scope: PartialAccountabilities: ReadyDecision rights: MissingPeople leadership: Partial
- Open questions before evaluation can proceed
- How many legal entities and countries does the role cover? Does the role independently approve expenditure, and to what limit? Are any direct reports managers, or are all individual contributors? These are the questions a consultant would ask before this role is graded.
- Next governed step
- Resolve open questionsThen: Job Evaluation Summary
AI Companion review notes · representative preview
Companion review notes — Senior Finance Manager grade question
What the Companion hands to the consultant before review. It structures evidence, flags gaps, challenges assumptions, and drafts questions. It prepares; it does not decide.
Representative PreviewRepresentative preview · not client dataUnder reviewIllustrative / Preview · AI prepares · consultant reviews · client decides
- Purpose
- Surface gaps and review focus for the human reviewer — advisory context only, never the decision.
- Date
- 2026-05-21
- Version
- v1
- Status
- In review
- Approval
- In review
- Reviewer(s)
- Named consultant reviewer
- Decision lineage
- Decision Room record · advisory context
Workflow stageAI-assisted review (preparation)Decision RoomRecorded as advisory context — never the decision
- Evidence the Companion structured
- Consolidated the job description, the hiring-manager intake note, and the organisation chart into four evidence vectors (scope, accountabilities, decision rights, people leadership) and aligned them to the reviewable Role Evidence Record.
- Gaps flagged
- Spend-approval authority is not stated — material to grade placement.
- Span of control is described as “a few analysts” — not quantified.
- Number of countries in scope is implied but not confirmed.
- Assumption challenged
- The intake note assumes this is a “regional” role at the same level as two peer roles. The evidence suggests narrower decision rights than those peers — the Companion flags this for the reviewer rather than resolving it.
- Alternatives compared (for review, not decision)
- Presented two bounded readings of the role — one consistent with the peer band, one a band below — each with the specific evidence that would confirm it. The choice between them is left to the consultant and client.
- Draft review questions for the consultant
- Confirm the expenditure-approval limit, if any, this role holds independently.
- Confirm whether any direct report is a people manager.
- Confirm the count of countries and legal entities in scope.
- Companion status on this item
- Evidence: StructuredGaps: FlaggedDecision: Not takenRouted to: Consultant review
Grade card · representative preview
Senior Finance Manager — illustrative role
Shows the shape of a governed Grade Card. Role evidence is summarised; the indicative grade position is bounded to a token; consultant review is required before any decision.
Representative PreviewRepresentative preview · not client dataUnder reviewIllustrative / Preview · AI prepares · consultant reviews · client decides
- Purpose
- Present the review-ready leveling outcome that feeds the leveling decision.
- Date
- 2026-05-21
- Version
- v1
- Status
- In review
- Approval
- In review
- Reviewer(s)
- Named consultant reviewer
- Decision lineage
- Decision Room record · leveling
Workflow stageEvaluation & levelingDecision RoomFeeds the leveling decision in the Decision Room
- Role evidence summary
- Owns financial planning across a multi-country business unit; reports to the divisional CFO; leads three managers and a team of analysts; sets analytical standards across the function.
- Leveling rationale (summary)
- Cross-country scope, second-line management, and analytical standard-setting place the role above a single-country individual contributor band and below a divisional finance leader band. Specific scoring is not disclosed.
- Indicative grade position
- Mid management bandIndicative · not final
- Evidence completeness
- Scope: ReadyAccountabilities: ReadyDecision rights: Under reviewPeople leadership: Ready
- Risks · assumptions · open questions
- Decision rights description is generic; consultant review will confirm whether this role independently approves spend above a stated threshold. The sub-team structure is described as “three managers” — confirm whether each manager owns an independent function or shares a single function.
- Consultant review required for
- Confirming decision rights and final grade position before this card becomes a decision input. Evalio AI prepares the structured view; the named consultant reviewer approves; the client decides.
Market summary · representative preview
Senior Finance Manager — market view
Demonstrates how Evalio frames market context for a role. No fabricated salary numbers, no invented comparators, no protected source values. Real client outputs derive from licensed sources under explicit source-rights.
Representative PreviewRepresentative preview · not client dataMissing evidenceIllustrative / Preview · AI prepares · consultant reviews · client decides
- Purpose
- Frame source-rights-aware market context to inform the pay-positioning review.
- Date
- 2026-05-21
- Version
- v1
- Status
- Draft
- Approval
- Draft
- Reviewer(s)
- Named consultant reviewer
- Decision lineage
- Decision Room record · pay positioning
Workflow stageMarket framingDecision RoomInforms the pay-positioning review in the Decision Room
Match confidence
Scope match: MediumIndustry match: HighGeography match: LowSeniority match: Medium
Confidence is rendered qualitatively because comparator distributions are not disclosed in preview.
Market movement narrative
For roles of this scope and seniority in this geography, recent market reads indicate upward pressure on total guaranteed cash, with stronger movement on variable pay than on base. Evalio does not publish a single-point market value for any role: governed outputs surface a banded view with consultant context.
Included in governed output
- Banded view with consultant interpretation.
- Source-rights statement and review window.
- Confidence posture per dimension.
Not shown in any preview
- Single-point salary numbers.
- Specific percentile values.
- Comparator company identities.
- Raw distribution data.
Internal equity · representative preview
Finance function — internal equity scan
Illustrative pattern detection only — no real employee data.
Representative PreviewRepresentative preview · not client dataRequires consultant validationIllustrative / Preview · AI prepares · consultant reviews · client decides
- Purpose
- Surface internal-equity patterns for consultant interpretation ahead of the equity decision.
- Date
- 2026-05-21
- Version
- v1
- Status
- In review
- Approval
- In review
- Reviewer(s)
- Named consultant reviewer
- Decision lineage
- Decision Room record · internal equity
Workflow stageEquity reviewDecision RoomLinked — internal equity decision
Pattern detection
Example patterns include compression between bands and potential inversion in isolated role comparisons.
Flags
CompressionInversionUnder review
Board governance pack · representative preview
Workforce decisions — Q-cycle board governance pack
The board-grade rollup. Summarises the governed workforce decisions in a cycle, their review posture, and audit coverage — so a board can see that decisions are evidence-led and recorded, without seeing protected mechanics.
Representative PreviewRepresentative preview · not client dataReadyIllustrative / Preview · AI prepares · consultant reviews · client decides
- Purpose
- Give the board a governed rollup of the cycle's workforce decisions, evidence, and approvals.
- Date
- 2026-05-21
- Version
- v1
- Status
- Approved
- Approval
- Approved
- Reviewer(s)
- CHRO, Compensation committee chair
- Decision lineage
- Decision Room records · board rollup
Workflow stageBoard governance (cycle rollup)Decision RoomCompiled from linked Decision Room records
- Decisions governed this cycle (illustrative)
- Grade alignments: a set of role familiesStructure refreshes: a small numberEquity reviews: one cohort
- Review & approval posture
- Consultant-reviewed: AllNamed approver recorded: AllDecisions pending review: A few
- Evidence posture across the cycle
- Most decisions rest on complete role evidence and source-rights-aware market views. A minority proceeded with documented consultant interpretation where comparator coverage was thin — each is flagged in its own record with a watching brief.
- Open governance risks for the board
- Comparator coverage is limited in one operating country — affects relativity confidence.
- One role family’s decision is held pending resolution of decision-rights evidence.
- Budget impact of the structure refresh is modelled as scenarios, not yet approved.
- Audit coverage
- Every decision in this pack links to an immutable Decision Room record with a time-stamped event trail and named actors. The board pack itself carries no editable figures — it is generated from those records and regenerated as they change.
- What this pack is — and is not
- Is: a summary of governed recordsIs not: a decision surfaceIs not: a methodology disclosure
Decision record · representative preview
Grade alignment for the Senior Finance Manager role family
Demonstrates the structure of a Decision Room record. Each field is populated with illustrative governance-shaped text — no client identities, no real decisions.
Representative PreviewRepresentative preview · not client dataReadyIllustrative / Preview · AI prepares · consultant reviews · client decides
- Purpose
- Confirm the grade band for the role family ahead of the structure refresh.
- Date
- 2026-05-21
- Version
- v1
- Status
- In review
- Approval
- In review
- Reviewer(s)
- Named consultant reviewer, Client approver
- Decision lineage
- Decision Room record · DR-preview
Workflow stageDecision recordedDecision RoomThis is the Decision Room record
- Decision context
- Confirm the grade band that the Senior Finance Manager role family sits within ahead of the upcoming structure refresh. The decision is bounded to grade placement only — pay-range setting and incumbent moves are scoped to a separate decision record.
- Evidence used
- Governed Grade Card for the role family (illustrative preview).
- Two adjacent role families’ grade cards for relativity context.
- Internal organisation chart confirming reporting line and span.
- Source-rights-aware market view for industry and geography.
- Assumptions
- That the role independently approves expenditure within a stated authority limit and that the three reporting managers each own an independent finance sub-function. Both assumptions are confirmed by the named consultant reviewer in this record.
- Open risks
- Geography match in the market view is rated Low — the role’s home country has limited comparator coverage. The decision proceeds with a documented consultant interpretation, and a watching brief is set for the next refresh.
- Approval posture
- AI brief: PreparedConsultant review: ApprovedClient decision: Pending
- Audit posture
- Every event on this record (brief drafted, evidence linked, reviewer assigned, review approved, client decided) is time-stamped and tied to an authenticated actor. The record cannot be edited after the client decision; subsequent changes spawn a new linked record.
Proof access path
How a guided proof review works.
Proof is reviewed under guidance — not self-served from raw data. The path keeps evidence boundaries and protected methodology intact.
01
Review previews
Start with the representative artifacts and the Decision Room preview on this page.
02
Request access
Ask for a guided proof review scoped to the decision you are accountable for.
03
Guided review
Evalio walks you through governed outputs and the evidence behind them, under boundaries.
04
Workspace scoping
If the fit holds, scope a bounded workspace where your own evidence becomes governed records.