Try Evalio · No signup · Representative data
Make one workforce decision. See what Evalio changes.
Choose a question you recognise, view it through the role you actually play, then change one assumption. Evalio recomputes the answer, shows the evidence and confidence behind it, and keeps the final decision visibly human-owned.
Evalio Preview · Demo Data · Not Client Data
- Real recomputation
- Controls drive bounded Evalio calculations, not a scripted animation.
- No client data
- Only versioned representative data is available before governed access.
- Human finality
- The preview can inform a decision; it cannot approve one.
Guided test drive
Start from the decision you are actually trying to make.
Pick a challenge, say who you are in the decision, then change the assumptions. Every figure below the controls is computed by a governed Evalio calculation against a versioned demonstration dataset — change an assumption and the whole analysis recomputes. This is a working product experience with bounded public access, not a prototype and not a final recommendation.
Data and scenario boundary
Data boundary: dataset evalio-demo-co version 2026.08.1 (synthetic-representative). Authored by Evalio for public demonstration. Not derived from any client, employee or survey source. The Lead Reservoir Engineer regrade case used by the optional worked example, Companion and executive artifact further down is a separate demonstration scenario; outputs from the two are never combined into one decision record.
Representative enterprise environment
Demo Co. · start with workforce affordability, then explore connected decisions
Start with the workforce affordability decision: test the cost envelope, protect critical capability and see the trade-off recompute. Then use the same versioned demonstration organisation to explore role, market, reward and governance questions. Your persona remains your decision lens; every journey uses the same public-safe dataset authority.
Session progress
0 / 5 decisions explored
Progress exists only in this browser session. It does not create a tenant record, approval or audit entry.
Your 3-minute value path
Change one assumption. See the decision move.
You are not watching a scripted tour. Choose a real workforce question, change the representative assumptions and see the governed answer recompute. No signup, no client data and no hidden approval authority.
- 1Choose a decision
- 2Set your lens
- 3Change assumptions
- 4Read the answer
Why this preview is safe to trust
Guided demonstration using representative, non-client data. Outputs are indicative and require authorised human review.
- Representative, versioned data only — never client or employee data.
- Real bounded computation — never decorative controls or invented outputs.
- Human decision authority remains outside the anonymous preview.
- Protected methodology, licensed data and final exports stay gated.
Step 1 · Decision
What are you trying to decide?
What you will end with: A baseline-versus-scenario affordability view with traceable assumptions, an explicit cost envelope and an explicit limitation that capability risk requires role-level evidence and human review.
Step 2 · Your lens
Who are you in this decision?
Your role changes what leads the analysis and who is accountable for the next step. It never hides a finding from you.
Step 3 · Assumptions
Move one assumption. Watch the answer change.
Start with one control. You do not need to configure the whole scenario to understand the value.
Additions are the primary driver of plan cost against the baseline.
Attrition offsets additions and changes the effective run rate.
Inflation compounds across the horizon and is an assumption, not a fact.
Fully loaded cost is base multiplied by the on-cost ratio the organisation uses.
The executive cost envelope makes affordability explicit; Evalio compares the scenario run-rate growth with this boundary.
The horizon determines how far assumptions are extended before review.
This visitor-declared boundary states what share of ending capacity must remain protected before the plan can be treated as capability-safe; it is not a prediction of delivered capability.
Step 4 · Governed answer
Can we afford the workforce plan without creating unacceptable capability risk?
Limited by design, not by omission
See the wider Evalio system without turning the preview into a feature catalogue.
The interactive experience above is deliberately focused on five decision journeys. The connected capability estate remains visible, but deeper operational access only opens where identity, tenancy, data rights and human accountability can be governed properly.
Broader Total Rewards context
Evalio connects role value, market position, reward fairness, affordability, workforce cost and executive decision quality without exposing the machinery that creates defensible judgement. Proprietary scoring, calibration and technical implementation remain protected.
- Interactive now
- 5
- decision journeys
- Connected context
- 7
- capabilities explained honestly
- Governed access
- 6
- surfaces kept behind governed enterprise access
Explore connected capabilities
Open only what matters to you. These capabilities are explained truthfully without simulated controls or protected know-how.
Leveling & Grading
Understand the role this plays
foundation
Leveling & Grading
Understand the role this plays
Presented as an explanation only. Grading structures are governed inside an authenticated workspace.
What you can understand safely
- read how evaluated size becomes a level and a grade
Job Architecture
Understand the role this plays
preview
Job Architecture
Understand the role this plays
Presented as an explanation only. Architecture design requires your own role inventory under governance.
What you can understand safely
- read how role families and levels are organised
Market Intelligence
Understand the role this plays
preview
Market Intelligence
Understand the role this plays
No market observations are shown before sign-up. Licensed survey data stays inside an entitled workspace with its source rights intact.
What you can understand safely
- read how survey sources, matching and source rights are governed
Salary Structures
Understand the role this plays
production
Salary Structures
Understand the role this plays
Presented as an explanation only. Structure design requires your own market and geographic inputs.
What you can understand safely
- read how ranges, midpoints and progression are governed
Benefits & Allowances
Understand the role this plays
preview
Benefits & Allowances
Understand the role this plays
Presented as an explanation only. The public cost model covers base pay; benefits, allowances and variable pay are modelled inside an entitled workspace.
What you can understand safely
- read how benefits and allowances enter total reward cost
Reports & Exports
Understand the role this plays
production
Reports & Exports
Understand the role this plays
Presented as an explanation only. Exportable artifacts require an entitled workspace.
What you can understand safely
- read what a governed report pack contains
Executive, CFO, CHRO, Total Rewards, Compensation, Governance and Board dashboards
Understand the role this plays
production
Executive, CFO, CHRO, Total Rewards, Compensation, Governance and Board dashboards
Understand the role this plays
Representative previews only. Live dashboards are tenant-scoped and require an authenticated workspace.
What you can understand safely
- view representative dashboard previews on the public dashboards page
See what requires governed enterprise validation
Workspace, intake, administration, consultant delivery, client review and advanced Companion modes need accountable identity and bounded authority. Rather than simulate them publicly, Evalio shows exactly where the access boundary sits and what the next governed step is.
Workspace
Governed access required
production
Workspace
Governed access required
Available through controlled enterprise validation. A preview visitor never becomes a tenant member.
What you can understand safely
- read what the tenant workspace governs
Data Intake
Governed access required
production
Data Intake
Governed access required
No upload path exists before sign-up. Governed intake runs inside an entitled workspace.
What you can understand safely
- read how governed intake and validation work
Admin & Tenant Operations
Governed access required
production
Admin & Tenant Operations
Governed access required
Administrative functions are unreachable from a public preview and require a governed authenticated role.
What you can understand safely
- read that administration is governed and separated from delivery
Consultant Operations
Governed access required
production
Consultant Operations
Governed access required
Consultant delivery is a governed engagement surface and is not previewed anonymously.
What you can understand safely
- read that consultant delivery is a governed engagement surface
Client Review Portal
Governed access required
production
Client Review Portal
Governed access required
Client review requires an attributable identity. Anonymous review carries no authority and is not offered.
What you can understand safely
- read that client review is an attributable, authenticated surface
AI Companion — Mentor, Decision, Scenario and Growth modes
Governed access required
preview
AI Companion — Mentor, Decision, Scenario and Growth modes
Governed access required
These modes operate on governed workspace context and are not run anonymously.
What you can understand safely
- read what each mode does and where its authority stops
Transparent boundaries
Limited access should increase trust, not create ambiguity.
The public experience is intentionally narrower than an authenticated Evalio workspace. What you can drive, what you can inspect, and what requires controlled enterprise validation are declared from one canonical capability manifest.
Every capability, with its honest status.
Nothing is presented as more mature or more accessible than it is. Interactive capabilities run against representative data; explained capabilities expose no decorative controls; operational surfaces remain behind accountable identity and authority.
| Capability | Status in this preview | Boundary that applies |
|---|---|---|
| Role Evidence | Interactive — you drive it here | Indicative demonstration output computed from versioned representative data. It is not an approved professional recommendation and requires authorised human review. |
| Job Evaluation | Interactive — you drive it here | Evaluation-readiness and scope-hypothesis output only. No level or grade is calculated publicly; both require the protected methodology and governed human approval. |
| Leveling & Grading | Explained — described, not driven here | Presented as an explanation only. Grading structures are governed inside an authenticated workspace. |
| Job Architecture | Explained — described, not driven here | Presented as an explanation only. Architecture design requires your own role inventory under governance. |
| Market Intelligence | Explained — described, not driven here | No market observations are shown before sign-up. Licensed survey data stays inside an entitled workspace with its source rights intact. |
| Pay Positioning | Interactive — you drive it here | Positioning is computed against a representative reference band, not licensed market data. No pay decision is produced for any individual. |
| Salary Structures | Explained — described, not driven here | Presented as an explanation only. Structure design requires your own market and geographic inputs. |
| Internal Equity | Interactive — you drive it here | Cohort-level signals from a five-person demonstration population. No individual outcome is produced and no protected-class analysis is run publicly. |
| Merit Cycle | Interactive — you drive it here | Indicative demonstration output computed from versioned representative data. It is not an approved professional recommendation and requires authorised human review. |
| Benefits & Allowances | Explained — described, not driven here | Presented as an explanation only. The public cost model covers base pay; benefits, allowances and variable pay are modelled inside an entitled workspace. |
| Workforce Cost Baseline | Interactive — you drive it here | Indicative demonstration output computed from versioned representative data. It is not an approved professional recommendation and requires authorised human review. |
| Workforce Planning & Budgeting | Interactive — you drive it here | Indicative demonstration output computed from versioned representative data. It is not an approved professional recommendation and requires authorised human review. |
| Scenario Engine | Interactive — you drive it here | Indicative demonstration output computed from versioned representative data. It is not an approved professional recommendation and requires authorised human review. |
| Decision Room | Interactive — you drive it here | A representative decision pack. No approval is recorded, no audit entry is written, and anonymous visitors hold no decision authority. |
| Reports & Exports | Explained — described, not driven here | Presented as an explanation only. Exportable artifacts require an entitled workspace. |
| Workspace | Enterprise validation only | Available through controlled enterprise validation. A preview visitor never becomes a tenant member. |
| Data Intake | Enterprise validation only | No upload path exists before sign-up. Governed intake runs inside an entitled workspace. |
| Admin & Tenant Operations | Enterprise validation only | Administrative functions are unreachable from a public preview and require a governed authenticated role. |
| Consultant Operations | Enterprise validation only | Consultant delivery is a governed engagement surface and is not previewed anonymously. |
| Client Review Portal | Enterprise validation only | Client review requires an attributable identity. Anonymous review carries no authority and is not offered. |
| Executive, CFO, CHRO, Total Rewards, Compensation, Governance and Board dashboards | Explained — described, not driven here | Representative previews only. Live dashboards are tenant-scoped and require an authenticated workspace. |
| AI Companion — Guide and Evidence modes | Interactive — you drive it here | The Companion is advisory and attributable. It cannot approve, decide or override governance, and every answer requires human review. |
| AI Companion — Mentor, Decision, Scenario and Growth modes | Enterprise validation only | These modes operate on governed workspace context and are not run anonymously. |
Capability manifest guided-test-drive-manifest/2026.08.1. Guided demonstration using representative, non-client data. Outputs are indicative and require authorised human review.
Optional deeper proof
Want more depth? Inspect one complete decision case.
The guided journey above is the fastest route to value. The worked case below is for buyers who want to inspect the broader evidence shape, Companion behavior and executive artifact without opening a workspace.
Open the Critical Role Regrading & Pay Adjustment Decision case
The decision, in the buyer's language
Should the Lead Reservoir Engineer role be regraded from Demo Band A to Demo Band B and receive a pay adjustment to the proposed band midpoint?
A 6,400-employee energy operator undertaking a critical-role review ahead of a major field-development program. A single incumbent role has been flagged by the business as a retention and delivery risk.
Role
Lead Reservoir Engineer · Engineering — Subsurface
Grade
Demo Band A → Demo Band B
Proposed midpoint
$201,000
Market median / P75
$195,000 / $221,000
Compa-ratio (proposed)
0.86
Criticality
mission-critical · high attrition
Worked example — how the engines read this case
An explained preview, not a live calculation. These readings are an authored walkthrough of this representative regrade case. The computed, recomputing analysis is the guided test drive above.
Job Evaluation
Risk: mediumLead Reservoir Engineer · scope, accountability, and know-how factors for a Engineering — Subsurface role.
Signal. Evaluated size supports a level above the current Demo Band A anchor.
Risk. Holding the role at its current grade understates evaluated accountability and invites challenge.
Implication. The evaluated size is consistent with the proposed Demo Band B band, not Demo Band A.
Decision impact. Supports the regrade direction on job-size grounds, independent of market or pay.
Unlock: Run your own roles through governed job evaluation with a defensible, auditable factor trail.
Grading
Risk: mediumCurrent Demo Band A (mid $168,000) vs proposed Demo Band B (mid $201,000).
Signal. Proposed grade lifts the midpoint by $33,000.
Risk. A one-off regrade can create a grade-boundary precedent for adjacent roles.
Implication. Regrade is structurally coherent but must be governed as a boundary case, not an exception.
Decision impact. Confirms the target band and quantifies the structural pay-line move.
Unlock: Model grade structures for your whole architecture and see boundary precedent before you commit.
Pay Positioning
Risk: highIncumbent base $172,500 vs market median $195,000 / P75 $221,000.
Signal. Against the proposed grade the incumbent sits at compa-ratio 0.86 — below the new midpoint.
Risk. Sub-midpoint positioning on a mission-critical, high-attrition role is a live retention exposure.
Implication. This positioning evidence informs human review; the Pay Positioning module does not generate an adjustment recommendation.
Decision impact. Surfaces positioning and retention evidence for a human-owned decision alongside equity, policy and affordability.
Unlock: Position any role against your own survey sources with source-rights and freshness governance.
Internal Equity
Risk: high4 same-grade peers (avg $166,000); adjacent-grade avg $198,500.
Signal. Compression flag raised · gap vs peers 3.9%.
Risk. Protected-class review required before any adjustment is finalized.
Implication. The adjustment must be sized to relieve compression without over-correcting against peers.
Decision impact. Adds a governed equity constraint the final recommendation must respect.
Unlock: Screen equity and compression across your population with an auditable aggregation boundary.
Workforce Cost
Risk: mediumIncremental base $28,500/yr · fully-loaded ratio 1.32.
Signal. 3-year cumulative cost of the move is $112,860.
Risk. Precedent exposure: 9 similar roles ≈ $256,500/yr if generalized.
Implication. The single-role cost is modest; the precedent exposure is the CFO's real number.
Decision impact. Frames affordability as precedent exposure, not just the incumbent's increment.
Unlock: Cost any decision fully-loaded, with precedent exposure modeled on your real headcount.
Merit Impact
Risk: mediumInteraction of an off-cycle regrade with the upcoming merit cycle and budget.
Signal. An off-cycle adjustment consumes budget the merit cycle has already earmarked.
Risk. Double-counting the increase across regrade and merit inflates the effective raise.
Implication. The regrade should be netted against, not stacked on, the incumbent's merit envelope.
Decision impact. Adds a sequencing rule: regrade now, adjust merit treatment to avoid stacking.
Unlock: Govern merit, exceptions, and off-cycle moves in one budget with stacking controls.
Scenario Impact
Risk: highThree paths: (A) regrade + adjust to midpoint, (B) regrade only, (C) hold.
Signal. Path C keeps the role at compa-ratio 0.86 with a 32-week refill exposure.
Risk. Holding protects budget short-term but carries the highest delivery and attrition risk.
Implication. Path A resolves market, equity, and retention; Path B leaves a live retention gap.
Decision impact. Ranks the options and exposes the trade the executive is actually choosing between.
Unlock: Compare governed scenarios on your data before a decision is locked and recorded.
HR Companion — guided, governed
Not open chat. Choose a guided action; every response is explainable, watermarked, and requires human review.
Executive Workforce Decision Brief
Evalio Preview · Demo Data · Not Final · Human Review Required
Decision Question
- Should the Lead Reservoir Engineer role be regraded from Demo Band A to Demo Band B and receive a pay adjustment to the proposed band midpoint?
- A 6,400-employee energy operator undertaking a critical-role review ahead of a major field-development program. A single incumbent role has been flagged by the business as a retention and delivery risk.
Evidence
- Role: Lead Reservoir Engineer (Engineering — Subsurface), mission-critical.
- Band: current Demo Band A (mid $168,000) → proposed Demo Band B (mid $201,000).
- Market: median $195,000, P75 $221,000; incumbent compa-ratio to proposed band 0.86.
- Equity: compression flagged; protected-class review required.
Authored Demo Signals
- Job Evaluation: Evaluated size supports a level above the current Demo Band A anchor.
- Grading: Proposed grade lifts the midpoint by $33,000.
- Pay Positioning: Against the proposed grade the incumbent sits at compa-ratio 0.86 — below the new midpoint.
- Internal Equity: Compression flag raised · gap vs peers 3.9%.
- Workforce Cost: 3-year cumulative cost of the move is $112,860.
- Merit Impact: An off-cycle adjustment consumes budget the merit cycle has already earmarked.
- Scenario Impact: Path C keeps the role at compa-ratio 0.86 with a 32-week refill exposure.
Scripted Companion Challenge
- Before you regrade Lead Reservoir Engineer to Demo Band B, confirm the job evaluation reflects sustained scope, not a one-program spike.
- The pay adjustment lands the incumbent at compa-ratio 0.86 — still below midpoint. Decide deliberately whether you are correcting to market or only to the band.
- A protected-class equity review is flagged; the recommendation is not defensible until that review is recorded.
CFO Risk Example
- Direct cost is modest: $28,500/yr incremental base.
- The real number is precedent exposure: ~$256,500/yr if generalized across 9 similar roles.
- Fully-loaded, the increment carries an on-cost ratio of 1.32; the 3-year cost is $112,860.
CHRO Risk Example
- Retention: mission-critical role, high attrition risk, 32-week refill — holding pay is a live people risk.
- Equity: a compression flag and a 3.9% peer gap mean the move must be sized against peers, not just market.
- Precedent: adjacent same-grade peers will read this as a signal; the CHRO owns the narrative and the boundary.
Recommendation Example
- Illustrative only: approve the regrade direction on job-size grounds; consider a governed pay adjustment toward the proposed midpoint, conditional on the protected-class equity review; treat precedent as a policy decision, not an exception.
Human Review Required
- Guided, scripted Companion examples demonstrate explain-and-challenge patterns; they are not live model output and remain advisory, non-final material. A named human retains review, approval and decision authority in governed flows.
Next Step
- Continue through governed Proof Access to work with your organization's data and an entitled final artifact flow.
Preview only. Final, exportable briefs require an entitled governed workspace.
Take the next step while the decision is still clear
Move from representative data to a bounded proof conversation around your own buying question. Governed access is reviewed; it is not an automatic tenant, unrestricted free trial or transfer of decision authority.
From aha to evidence
Use the same decision discipline with your context.
You have seen how Evalio connects evidence, assumptions and workforce consequences. No additional access tier is required to understand the proposition. When deeper governed evidence, operational validation or organisation-specific review is needed, continue through a controlled enterprise conversation.
The experience is built around Total Rewards business judgement, reward economics, workforce consequence and executive decision quality. Proprietary methodology and technical implementation remain protected.
What changes next
- More relevance: focus only on the modules tied to your decision.
- More evidence: inspect governed workflow, lineage and review controls in context.
- Same boundaries: no automatic approval authority, no protected-methodology exposure and no silent use of your data.
Want the governed surfaces this preview does not open? Talk to Evalio about governed enterprise validation when you need deeper operational evidence.
Give feedback on the test drive
Help shape the experience
Tell us what helped—or slowed your decision.
Structured feedback is durably recorded for human review. Name the domain, module or recovery moment you experienced; do not include employee or personal data.